"The Zalewski's Theorem" Ang Dating Daan" is a teleevangelist organization in the Phillipines. See www.angdatingdaan.com for more. --------------- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 23:23:34 -0800 (PST) From: Rey Lagonsin <...> To: Michal Zalewski Cc: Romeo Santisteban <...> Subject: ADD is evil? Dear Mister or Miss Michal Zalewski: The theory why ang dating daan is evil is indeed very ingenious but not so original I think because there has been a lot of theorizing on the so called Bible Code and up to now nothing conclusive has been established. But the theory is so impressive that a lot of people are deluded into thinking that most or all of it is real. But is it? Or is it true that your results are based on the biased premise/s of those who wish to establish their subjective "truths." In fact I think that with some tinkering with numbers appropriate to your name and relating them to some significant dates in world history like what you have done, then perhaps you can also establish that you are god, probably even the Almighty yourself. I wish I had your talent for theorizing and concluding based on superficial "evidence" like what you've done, because I have a feeling that based on my own set of premises, I might also be able to prove that I was the one who created the universe. But why don't you dig deeper and perhaps you might also find evil in our official name "Mga Kaanib ng Iglesia ni YHWH kay Yaoshua Messiah, haligi at saligan ng katothanan sa Pilipinas." And while you're at it, why not try to find out what Bro. Eliseo Soriano is saying regarding the evils that men do in this world. Perhaps you will also find evil in those pronouncements. Or, since you seem to have the luxury of time having analyzed all those numbers and researched the most significant and momentous events in world history that you deem most relevant to the name ang dating daan, then perhaps you can find the time to analyze the doctrines believed in by members of "ang dating daan" (which incidentally is the name of a tv show hosted by Bro. Soriano). Perhaps you will find evil in that too. Indeed, to paraphrase a popular quotation - evil is in the eye (or heart) of the beholder. If your heart sees evil in a religion that has been instrumental in turning many people away from adultery, alcoholism, drug and tobacco addiction, etc., then so be it. You are entitled to your biases and opinionated conclusions. But the term bias is oftentimes related to ignorance. If it is not ignorance that is the root of the bias, it could be due to a refusal to acknowledge universal truths because of miseducation by bigots who have their own sets of biases which they want to propagate for their personal or organizational aggrandizement, or perhaps a bitter experience, or probably due to plain malice in the heart. That's why we have to invite you to probe deeper and if you think that ang dating daan is evil despite your subcutaneous analysis of the organization, then let your sincere appreciation be your guide to your firm and final conclusion. Perhaps by doing so you will still find further proofs supporting your "evil" conclusion. Why not try reading Dan. 12:10. This could be relevant to your analysis. We would be happy to receive word from you on other further conclusions that you may find regarding the organization. Who knows, we might just believe you. RMLagonsin Copyright (C) 2002 by Michal Zalewski (lcamtuf@coredump.cx). **** THE PROOF THAT angdatingdaan IS EVIL **** A N G D A T I N G D A A N 65 78 71 68 65 84 73 78 71 68 65 65 78 - as ASCII values 2 6 8 5 2 3 1 6 8 5 2 2 6 - digits added \_________/ \_________/ \_________/ \_________/ \_/ 7 1 6 9 6 - digits added Thus, "angdatingdaan" is 71696. /.../ This number, when read backwards, gives 0438. This, written in octal, gives 666 - the number of the Beast. Enough said - QED. ---------------- Ok, so I replied. Politely. And this is what I got in response: ---------------- Mr. (or Ms.) Zalewski: I hope you will not take offense at my letter. We just do not want people to be misled into thinking that your conclusion is accurate. By the way, I just noticed - what on earth does Ford's Edsel has to do with ang dating daan. If you can justify your answer, I'm hooked on the accuracy of your theory (and conclusion). RMLagonsin Bro. Romy: The attached is my revised commentary on Zalewski's Theorem. Hope you find this as interesting. Please disseminate to all interested. Bro. Rey ...followed by the exact copy of the document attached previously, except: < to the name ang dating daan, then perhaps you can find the time to analyze --- > to the name ang dating daan (on second thought, what has ang dating daan got > to do with Ford's Edsel?), then perhaps you can find the time to analyze ---------------- Uh. ...and, not surprisingly, two years later, Ann-dating-Dan strikes again, though in a more covert way: ---------------- 210.14.7.7 - - [28/May/2005:07:05:12 +0200] http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/evilfinder/ef.cgi?said=angdatingdaan ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Norman Yutuc" Subject: Re-"Evil" Formula Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 05:11:40 +0000 Michal Zalewski Your formula is full of shit. Where did you ever get that? In the Sewer? ---------------- Another mail comes in later: ---------------- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:36:06 -0700 (PDT) From: rholu augusto <...> Subject: Hello, Michal Dear Michal Zalewski: http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/evilfinder/ef.cgi?said=angdatingdaan Why did you say that ANG DATING DAAN (The Old Way) is evil? If you are an evil finder, you must have found this already: "You have made a mistake Dominic! 50 + 50 + 5 + 500 + 1 = 606 only L + L + V + X + D + I = 616 That`s not 666. Here is 666 ELLEN GOULD WHITE L + L + V + L + D + V + V + I = 666 50 + 50 + 5 + 50 + 500 + 5 + 5 + 1 = 666 That`s the sabbatharian`s version of the 666 in the book of Revelation. Now your turn. UICARIUS FILII DEI Granting for the sake of argument THAT your pope is the VICAR OF CHRIST. Who is Christ? Certainly you will answer, the Son of God. Correct me if I`m wrong, coz I don`t know latin grammar. What is the correct rendition of Vicar of the Son of God in Latin expression? If it is UICARIUS FILII DEI, then your head is 666. " quoted from http://www.religious-debate.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=143&start=480 Jeremiah 6:16 and Job 22:15 (compare) Rholu D. Augusto ---------------- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:45:09 -0700 From: Softnet IT Center Subject: COMMENT What's the CLEARNESS on your topic about "Ang Dating Daan"? Is there any documentation or any institution teaching the way you solve it... Instead of finding ways to "DOWN" that group, can you study their teachings so you can see the GOODNESS of the Lord. You have time... it's not late! GOD IS WATCHING US!